Technology

Convex vs Supabase: Backend-as-a-Service Comparison

Compare Convex vs Supabase for app backends. Real-time, database, serverless functions, and DX.

3
Convex
vs
2
Supabase
Quick Verdict

Convex excels in real-time reactive apps with its integrated approach. Supabase is better for SQL-centric apps needing PostgreSQL's power and open-source flexibility. Convex for DX-first real-time apps; Supabase for data-heavy PostgreSQL workloads.

Detailed Comparison

A side-by-side analysis of key factors to help you make the right choice.

Factor
ConvexRecommended
SupabaseWinner
Real-Time Sync
Built-in reactive queries, automatic UI updates
Real-time subscriptions via PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY
Database
Document database with TypeScript-first schema
Full PostgreSQL with SQL, joins, extensions
Developer Experience
End-to-end TypeScript, zero-config, type-safe queries
Good DX but requires SQL knowledge, more config
Open Source & Self-Host
Proprietary, cloud-only
Fully open source, self-hostable
Serverless Functions
Integrated mutations/actions with ACID transactions
Edge Functions (Deno) with separate deployment
Total Score3/ 52/ 50 ties
Real-Time Sync
Convex
Built-in reactive queries, automatic UI updates
Supabase
Real-time subscriptions via PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY
Database
Convex
Document database with TypeScript-first schema
Supabase
Full PostgreSQL with SQL, joins, extensions
Developer Experience
Convex
End-to-end TypeScript, zero-config, type-safe queries
Supabase
Good DX but requires SQL knowledge, more config
Open Source & Self-Host
Convex
Proprietary, cloud-only
Supabase
Fully open source, self-hostable
Serverless Functions
Convex
Integrated mutations/actions with ACID transactions
Supabase
Edge Functions (Deno) with separate deployment

Key Statistics

Real data from verified industry sources to support your decision.

Supabase: 75K+ GitHub stars, fully open source

GitHub

GitHub (2025)
Convex reactive queries update UIs in <50ms on average

Convex benchmarks

Convex benchmarks (2025)
Supabase supports 50+ PostgreSQL extensions

Supabase docs

Supabase docs (2025)

All statistics are from reputable third-party sources. Links to original sources available upon request.

When to Choose Each Option

Clear guidance based on your specific situation and needs.

Choose Convex when...

  • Building real-time reactive applications.
  • Need an integrated development approach.
  • Prioritize speed and responsiveness.

Choose Supabase when...

  • Focusing on SQL-centric applications.
  • Need PostgreSQL's capabilities.
  • Prioritize open-source solutions.

Our Recommendation

Convex excels in real-time reactive apps with its integrated approach. Supabase is better for SQL-centric apps needing PostgreSQL's power and open-source flexibility. Convex for DX-first real-time apps; Supabase for data-heavy PostgreSQL workloads.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about this comparison answered.

Convex wins for TypeScript projects with its end-to-end typing. Supabase wins for teams familiar with SQL and relational modeling.
Technically yes, but not recommended. Choose based on your primary needs - real-time first (Convex) or SQL/relational first (Supabase).
We use Convex for most new projects due to superior TypeScript DX and automatic real-time. We use Supabase when clients need SQL or have existing Postgres data.

Need help deciding?

Book a free 30-minute consultation and we'll help you determine the best approach for your specific project.

Free consultation
No obligation
Response within 24h