Spotify Built an AI Coding Agent That Replaced Writing Code — Here's What Developers Need to Know

Spotify's internal AI coding agent Honk, powered by Claude Code, has transformed how their top engineers work. They haven't written a single line of code since December — and shipped 50+ features.

Spotify Built an AI Coding Agent That Replaced Writing Code — Here's What Developers Need to Know

Spotify Built an AI Coding Agent That Replaced Writing Code — Here's What Developers Need to Know

Spotify Built an AI Coding Agent That Replaced Writing Code spotify's top engineers haven't written a single line of code since December. That's not a prediction — it's a statement from co-CEO Gustav Söderström during the company's Q4 2025 earnings call. Spotify Built an AI Coding Agent That Replaced Writing Code behind it? An internal AI coding agent called Honk, powered by Anthropic's Claude Code.

This isn't a startup demo or a research paper. It's a 751-million-user platform shipping production features with AI-generated code. And it changes the conversation about what AI coding agents can actually do at scale.

What Is Honk and How Does It Work?

Honk is Spotify's internal AI coding system built on top of Claude Code and the Claude Agent SDK. Spotify Built an AI Coding Agent That Replaced Writing Code It integrates directly with Slack, allowing engineers to interact with the AI agent from their phones.

Here's the workflow Söderström described on the earnings call:

  1. An engineer commutes to work and opens Slack on their phone
  2. They send a natural language prompt to Claude — "fix this bug" or "add this feature to the iOS app"
  3. Claude navigates the codebase, makes changes, runs formatters, linting, builds, and tests
  4. A new app build is pushed back to the engineer via Slack
  5. The engineer reviews and merges to production — all before arriving at the office

The entire process runs in sandboxed containers with limited permissions. No free-roaming AI with root access — it's constrained, supervised, and integrated into existing CI/CD pipelines.

The Numbers That Matter

The scale of Honk's impact is significant:

MetricDetail
Features shipped50+ new features and changes throughout 2025
Agent PRs merged650+ agent-generated pull requests per month
Engineering time savedUp to 90% on complex code migrations
Monthly active users751 million (record high in Q4 2025)
Senior devs not codingSince December 2025

These aren't benchmarks from a controlled environment. They come from Spotify's production codebase — a system serving three-quarters of a billion users.

Why Honk Works: A Decade of Infrastructure

Most coverage frames this as a Claude Code story. Spotify Built an AI Coding Agent That Replaced Writing Code It's actually an infrastructure story.

Honk sits on top of Fleet Management, a framework Spotify has been building since 2022 for applying code changes across hundreds or thousands of repositories at once. Before AI, about half of Spotify's pull requests already flowed through this system — but limited to mechanical tasks like bumping dependencies and updating configs.

The critical foundation is Backstage, Spotify's open-source internal developer portal. Backstage catalogs every component, tracks ownership, and standardizes how software gets built. As Spotify's engineering team puts it: "You can't safely automate what you don't understand."

This matters because it explains why most companies can't simply "deploy Claude Code" and get the same results. Spotify's advantage isn't the AI model — it's years of investment in:

  • Clear component ownership across all repositories
  • Standardized build systems that agents can interact with
  • Comprehensive test suites that validate AI-generated code
  • Strong feedback loops with what Spotify calls a "Judge" to guide the agent

Without this infrastructure, the code the agent produces "simply doesn't work," according to Spotify's own engineering blog series from late 2025.

What This Means for Developers

Let's address the elephant in the room: does this mean developers are being replaced?

No — but the role is transforming. Spotify's senior engineers didn't get laid off. They shifted from writing code to supervising AI-generated code. As Söderström put it, they "only generate code and supervise it."

This is the emerging pattern across the industry:

  • Code writing is becoming a commodity that AI handles
  • Code review and architecture become the primary human activities
  • System design and judgment are where human expertise remains critical
  • Infrastructure investment determines whether AI coding agents actually work

The Real Lesson for Engineering Teams

The takeaway isn't "use Claude Code and stop coding." It's that AI coding agents require serious infrastructure investment to work at scale. Spotify didn't flip a switch — they spent years building Fleet Management, Backstage, standardized testing, and component ownership models before AI could be effective.

Companies that skip this groundwork and expect AI agents to magically transform their development process will be disappointed.

Spotify's Bigger AI Ambitions

Beyond coding, Spotify is building a proprietary dataset around music knowledge that it believes no one else can replicate. Spotify Built an AI Coding Agent That Replaced Writing Code Söderström noted that music preferences — like what constitutes "workout music" — vary dramatically by geography and culture.

"This is a dataset that we are building right now that no one else is really building. It does not exist at this scale. And we see it improving every time we retrain our models," he said.

Spotify recently shipped several AI-powered user-facing features:

  • Prompted Playlists — AI-generated playlists from natural language descriptions
  • Page Match — AI matching for audiobooks
  • About This Song — AI-powered story behind the music you're listening to

The Bottom Line

Spotify's Honk is the most compelling real-world proof point for AI coding agents in production. Spotify Built an AI Coding Agent That Replaced Writing Code Not because the AI is magic, but because it demonstrates what happens when you combine a capable AI model with years of disciplined infrastructure investment.

For developers, the message is clear: the future isn't about AI replacing you. It's about whether your organization has the infrastructure to make AI coding agents actually work. And for most companies, that's where the real challenge lies.


Spotify Built an AI Coding Agent That Replaced Writing Code: Frequently Asked Questions

What is Spotify's Honk AI coding agent?

Honk is Spotify's internal AI coding system built on Anthropic's Claude Code and the Claude Agent SDK. It allows engineers to request code changes via Slack, and the AI handles writing, testing, and building the code — all in sandboxed containers with limited permissions.

Have Spotify developers really stopped writing code?

According to co-CEO Gustav Söderström, Spotify's most senior engineers "haven't written a single line of code since December." They've shifted to generating code via AI prompts and supervising the output rather than writing code manually.

How many features has Spotify shipped using AI-generated code?

Spotify shipped more than 50 new features and changes throughout 2025. The Honk system merges over 650 agent-generated pull requests into production every month, saving up to 90% of engineering time on complex code migrations.

Can other companies replicate what Spotify did with Honk?

Not easily. Honk's success depends on years of infrastructure investment — Fleet Management (since 2022), Backstage (open-source developer portal), standardized build systems, and comprehensive test suites. Without this foundation, AI coding agents produce unreliable results.

Does Honk mean AI will replace software developers?

No. Spotify's developers weren't replaced — their role transformed. They shifted from writing code to supervising AI-generated code, focusing on architecture, code review, and system design. The real shift is from code writer to code supervisor.

Share article

Share: