---
type: Comparison
title: "Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4 Turbo: Premium AI Model Comparison"
description: "Compare Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4 Turbo. Reasoning, coding, pricing, and capabilities analyzed."
resource: "https://www.contextstudios.ai/comparisons/claude-opus-4-6-vs-gpt-4-turbo"
category: provider
language: en
timestamp: "2026-02-20T08:40:01.110Z"
---

# Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4 Turbo: Premium AI Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4 is Anthropic's 2025 flagship with top-tier coding and reasoning. GPT-4 Turbo, while superseded by newer models, remains popular for its balance of capability and cost.

## Comparison Factors

| Factor | Claude Opus 4.6 | GPT-4 Turbo | Winner |
|--------|------|------|--------|
| Coding Performance | 72.5% SWE-bench, excellent multi-file refactoring | ~50% SWE-bench, good but behind newer models | a |
| Reasoning | Extended thinking with chain-of-thought, top GPQA scores | Solid reasoning but no extended thinking | a |
| Context Window | 200K tokens with strong recall | 128K tokens with degrading recall past 64K | a |
| Pricing | $15/MTok input, $75/MTok output | $10/MTok input, $30/MTok output | b |
| Multimodal | Vision, PDF analysis, code execution | Vision, DALL-E integration, browsing | tie |

## Key Statistics

- 72.5% vs ~50% on SWE-bench Verified
- 200K vs 128K context window

## Choose Claude Opus 4.6 When

- You need advanced coding and reasoning capabilities.
- Complex tasks are your focus.
- Budget allows for premium options.

## Choose GPT-4 Turbo When

- You need a more affordable solution.
- Basic tasks are your main concern.
- You prefer established technologies.

## Verdict

Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms GPT-4 Turbo in coding and reasoning. GPT-4 Turbo is more affordable but increasingly outdated for complex tasks.

Keywords: claude opus 4 vs gpt-4 turbo, anthropic vs openai, best ai model 2025